Archive for July, 2010

What is the Relationship between Torah narrative and Torah law? – Parashat Miqqets

Friday, July 30th, 2010

In Parashat Miqqets, we find heroes who are unique in ancient writing.

Ancient pagan heroes, both outside and inside the Bible, are mighty men with insatiable passions. They crave wealth, power, sex, glory, and immortality. Their lives are larger than others, but their goals are no less petty and their passions no less pedestrian than others.

The Pharaoh image of the archeological record as well as the Scriptural report appears as an absolute monarch who presents himself as a totalitarian autocrat, all powerful, always in control of everything, who really rules by image and for the biblical reader, is in actual fact a lot less in control than he he projects himself to be. The Pharaoh of the exodus cannot parry ten plagues and Joseph’s Pharaoh cannot understand his own dreams, much less know what he ought to do with those dreams. Alternatively, Joseph and Moses are both smart and ethical; they are given power by God because they are good to other people. They can be trusted with extraordinary power because they are moved by ethics, not instinct, by principle, not passion, and by selflessness, not selfishness.

For the pagan, the human king is a god; for Israel, God is the king. For people who revel in power, the hero has a strong will and strong muscles; for Israel, the hero has a strong will and a strong internalized moral code that with God’s help actually makes a difference in history.

Both Joseph and Judah overcame their sibling rivalries. First, we consider Judah. He participate in the sale of his hated brother and bother. Joseph would report to Jacob that Judah was doing wrongly, acting in a way that disappointed the ethical Jacob. Recall that when Judah was consorting with Tamar, his daughter-in-law who had a moral claim to his son, Joseph was resisting Mrs. Potifer. In order to look like the harlot, Tamar seduced Judah by covering her face. To this day, some Muslim women cover their face. This face covering is the professional uniform of the harlot. In this oldest of professions, anonymity is essential. This covering is not about modesty. Excessive covering does not conceal; excessive covering really reveals. Tamar is renting her body but hiding her identity; Judah wants pleasure without responsibility. After the sexual encounter, when Judah leaves his signet ring and staff, the modern equivalent of a credit card, Judah realizes he has acted irresponsibly; he has yet to admit that he acted wrongly. He knows he should be prudent but is not yet willing to be proper.

Pregnant from her incognito encounter with Judah, a stunning echo of Leah’s marital first encounter with Jacob, Tamar’s belly begins to bulge.

Assuming his role of sheikh, judge, and upholder of public morality, Judah is called upon to judge the pregnant out of wedlock wench, and decrees that for her crime of fiery passion she should be burned to death. Tamar produces the signet ring and staff of the father of the child, she produces the credit card of her client, the double standard, double dealing, double talking Judah, the hypocrite who just sentenced her to death. Judah at that moment matures, conceding her claim, “she is more righteous than I.” He admitted his wrong, he saw that his shame was because he was unfaithful to his father’s ethic.

Joseph’s star was rising as Judah’s star was dimming. Because he can tell dreams, organize food distribution, and manage other men, Pharaoh invests Joseph with political power because Joseph possesses what Pharaoh mistakes for magical power. Meanwhile, back in Canaan, there is a famine and the brothers who sold the person of their brother are sent to purchase bread from their brother, who has it within his power to wreck vengeance upon his brothers, to even scores, to set history straight. After all, the brothers bow down to him, as predicted in the dream. Joseph put his siblings to the test; did they grow up or not? Will they act as pagans or as son’s of Israel, is right might or is might right?

A chastened, mature, and ethical Judah now confronts Joseph; like Pharaoh who in his dream walks on water but in real life is king with an image, Judah becomes good. He will sacrifice himself to save Benjamin, having nothing to win but his integrity, nothing to preserve but his conscience, nothing to gain but his goodness. Judah has by his selfless act grown into Joseph, who never acts wrongly, who suffered by denying the advances of Mrs. Potipher.

Once Joseph becomes reconciled to his brothers, Judah by means of a courageous conscience and Joseph by refusing to wreck vengeance, God intercedes. Israel is enslaved but endures because it is a nation with a conscience and moral compass. Israel is a nation that values kindness and fidelity, real and not false modesty, that nurses care for others and not vengeance upon others.

The ethical values that for the Narrator, i.e., God, that carry valence are:

  • Being good is better than being strong of body.
  • Sacrificing oneself for other people means that we respect the image of God in the other.
  • Loyalty to marital commitments is not prudish, it is not merely prudent, it is a commanded commitment.
  • Grudges are dehumanizing.
  • Ethics are the essence of biblical nobility.

For pagans, law is the shackle that keeps order for the king’s coffers; for Israel, the law is the good reminder for good people that a good God demands goodness. Shabbat reminds us not to enslave each other, kashrut reminds us to eat and celebrate with each other, and every commandment for which we say a blessing is a commandment to be a blessing. The king of the universe took a good people out of Egypt so that this people may become great. Our sages teach that far better than using strength to conquer others is the application of conscience to be heroic we conquer are selves, for good.

  • Share/Bookmark

The Hanukka Confict

Tuesday, July 27th, 2010

The fight between the Syrian Greeks and their Hellenistic Jewish clients and the historically faithful Jews the “Hassidim” not a fight between Orthodox religion, the good old ways of the old time religion that is not good enough for everyone, and the new high culture, the Hellenism which is the culture of conquest, the domain of dominion, of insiders who are “betters,” aristocrats, who because they are better have the right to liver better.

The fights is about what culture ought to be, how civilization is to be maintained, and what it means to be a human person in a social setting. The ancient Sumerian king Gilgamesh was a warrior. He killed others for a living, he took young brides for himself, he made his kingdom suffer for his pleasure. In Israel, the prophet Samuel taught that the human king is an image, handsome, and a self-serving exploitative thief. For the pagan, Greek and Mesopotamian, European and oriental, Jew and gentile, the king is a god and people are slaves. For Israel, God is a just king and the king, to be a servant of God, serves and is not an enslaver of people. By preferring Babylonian–and Greek and German heroes– to the Bible’s heroes and ethics, Friedrich Delitzsch was not making an academic statement; this student of myth invoked the myth of academic authority in order to make the claim that selfish mean men of power are real humans, that the biblical ethic is weak, sickly, restrictive, and inhibits real men who want to live real lives. After all, how do we rise to the top if we do not climb over the shoulders, backs, and cadavers of others.

The Babylonians and Greeks lived by will. Hesiod took the Semitic stories to the West, teaching that:

  • The gods are immortal, great in power and petty in petulance.
  • These gods are not to be questioned, they do what they will because they are driven by will.
  • Life is hard, short, and painful.
  • Therefore, take what you can when you can.
  • Stay on the good side of those in power.
  • Lower grade humans are existing to serve and to be exploited.
  • These cultures are egocentric, led by leaders who mislead, who by dint of station are always right and cannot by definition do misdeed.

The ancient Jewish Hassidim were not blind fanatics, they realized the threat that their Torah posed to paganism, challenging hierarchy, taking citizenship seriously and authority critically.

For Israel:

  • There is only one God, Who is immortal, eternal, moral, just and fair. Pagan gods never resent human inhumanity because pagans confuse morality with utility; the God of Israel gives humans the image of God to render humans goodly and godly and intolerant of immoral, petty petulance.
  • The God of Israel may be questioned regarding law and ethics because God wills to be a communal, constitutional king, with no human allowed to speak in God’s voice
  • Being good sanctifies the good doer, making every good moment an eternity. The Jewish hero does not conquer peoples and cities; the Jewish hero conquers oneself.
  • All people carry God’s image; therefore oppressing a person is an assault upon God
  • The pagan is ego centric; the Jew is texto-centric
  • We are on God’s good side when we act goodly toward each other
    • We are governed by God who authored a book, the Good Book.
    • We spar with words, we do not pierce with swords,
    • Power has to be just in order to be justified

It is well known that the Amorites conquered Sumer militarily but were conquered by the Sumerians culturally. It is also well known that the Romans conquered the Greeks militarily but were conquered by the Greeks culturally.

Similarly, the Hasmoneans fought off the Hellenizers at first but, once in power, became Hellenized themselves. In classical pagan habit, the Hasmonean priests assumed the role of kings. For the pagan, from Egypt’s Narmer and Sumer’s Gilgamesh, religion is the instrument of state that legitimates the human rulers as appointees of gods as vicars of the divine on earth. The job of religion is to justify those in power.

In contrast, Biblical Federalism limits the accumulation of power by separating Israelite monarchy, priesthood and judiciary. Sanctity flows from the individual up and not from the monarch down. For the pagan, being a member of the elite, being a robust imbiber of the vine’s fruit at Socrates’ Symposium on the meaning of love is for the [1] elite [2] aristocratic [3] male. At the Jewish seder/symposium, [1] the poorest of Israel gets wine for the freeman’s table, [2] the Jewish waiter joins the served for the ritual and [3] women sit at the table, with the men. When priests become king, religion becomes debated; religion is a commodity for sale. Rabbinates and Yeshivot become family businesses; in the “Tradition/Masora” of Simon Magus [Acts 8] there are those who paid for holy Catholic offices with cold, hard cash. In this world, treason is heresy, autonomy is revolution, freedom is chaos, and individuality is absurd.

Pagan cult pomp celebrates elites and power. Humans crave power, money and deference, the perks of pagan pomp. Hence the Hasmoneans, once in power, were intoxicated by magnetism of the Greek model.

This ancient conflict animates contemporary Israel. On one hand, Leib Tropper of the parochial Orthodox Eternal Jewish Family [that accepts only the Orthodox conversions of Haredi clerics because their Orthodox theological franchise assumes that modern Orthodox is fraudulent Orthodox] resigned his position because of what appears to be sexual improprieties. When power is centralized in an oligarchic elite, power flows to the head, the conscience is starved, and God’s commanding voice merges with the ego of the elitist. When religious and political power are fused, the mixed idealistic rhetoric and selfish policy are confused by the subject community.

The Hanukka message is that the light of the candle sheds light upon the book. Power resides in the people, who judge the elite. Real Jewish leaders teach by word and example and smile, not with coercion, dictation or scowl. The truth of Torah identifies the false king, the naked king, the enslaving, the “religious” king, for the idol that he is, empowering all Israel, every individual within Israel, with the light of Torah, to discern and show concern, to ask and to question, to probe and to point, to observe and to uphold the command of the King of Kings.

  • Share/Bookmark